ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Pairwise ratio transformation of gene expression data leads to improved checkpoint response prediction in lung cancer patients.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards the digital analytical sciences in chemistry and biochemistry: from FAIR data ecosystems to artificial intelligence.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning algorithms identify patterns that would otherwise be difficult to observe in high-dimensional molecular and clinical data. For this reason, machine learning has the potential to have a profound impact on clinical decision-making and drug target discovery. However, there are technical challenges in adapting these tools for clinical use, including clinical feature engineering, model selection, and defining optimal strategies for model training. For cancer care, RNA sequencing of patient tumor biopsies has already proven to be a powerful molecular assay to characterize tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic phenotypes influencing therapeutic response, but an optimal solution for using gene expression data to predict outcome is yet to be established.
resultsWe developed the tauX machine learning framework to refine gene expression features and improve the predictive performance of RNA-sequencing data. The tauX framework uses aggregated ratios of positively and negatively associated predictive genes to simplify the prediction task. We showed a significant improvement in predictive performance using a large database of synthetic gene expression profiles. We also showed how the tauX framework can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of response and resistance to checkpoint blockade therapy using data from the Stand Up to Cancer (SU2C) Lung Response Cohort and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The tauX framework achieved superior predictive performance (~ 30% improvement) compared to models built upon established feature engineering strategies or widely used cancer gene expression signatures. The tauX framework is available as a freely deployable docker container ( https://hub.docker.com/r/pfeiljx/taux ).
conclusionBy simultaneously modeling gene expression signatures associated with response and resistance to drug therapy, the tauX approach revealed expression patterns that can be used to improve genomic medicine strategies in several ways. Significantly, tauX allows the paired response and resistance signatures to be used to design new companion diagnostics. Application of the tauX framework can also be used to identify drug targets by indicating genes that consistently associate with resistance. Improved performance in drug response prediction using the tauX approach can support data-driven decision-making in the precision medicine space that can lead to improved clinical outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.