SynthesisBMC medical ethics2025
Ethical dilemmas in continuing pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Synthesis in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart defects (CHD) are a significant cause of prenatal and postnatal morbidity and mortality, leading to complex ethical and moral decisions for parents when diagnosed in utero. The decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy after a CHD diagnosis involves multifaceted considerations, including cultural, religious, and personal values, alongside medical, ethical, and socioeconomic factors. This systematic review delves into the multifaceted moral considerations involved in the decision-making process regarding continuing a pregnancy following a CHD diagnosis.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted using a narrative synthesis approach. Peer-reviewed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies addressing ethical issues related to parental decision-making and clinical care following a prenatal CHD diagnosis were included. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL, ProQuest, ERIC, and Embase. Findings were synthesized thematically to identify key ethical tensions, factors contributing to moral complexity, challenges faced by parents and healthcare providers, and supportive strategies.
resultsThe synthesis of 25 studies from North America, Europe, Australia, and the Middle East (Iran) revealed a universal parental experience of acute psychological crisis following a prenatal diagnosis of CHD. However, the ethical frameworks guiding parental decision-making were highly context-dependent. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) a central ethical tension between the sanctity of life and the quality of life, with perspectives strongly shaped by religious beliefs, legal statutes, and cultural norms; (2) The Lived Experience of the Decision-Making Crisis; and (3) Strategies for Navigating the Ethical Terrain.
conclusionA prenatal CHD diagnosis initiates a profound moral journey for parents that extends far beyond a medical decision. The resulting psychological crisis—driven by the tension between sanctity and quality of life—underscores the need for a shift in clinical practice. Evidence supports the adoption of a holistic, multidisciplinary framework grounded in cultural sensitivity and empathetic communication to empower parents in making value-congruent choices during one of life’s most difficult experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.