Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388270›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

From needs assessment to usability testing: evaluating the AinoAid™ chatbot for domestic violence support.

Catharina Vogt, Stefanie Giljohann, Natalie Köpsel, Sandra González Cabezas, Jarmo Houtsonen, Ainhoa Izaguirre Choperena, Anna Juusela, Emanuel Tananau Blumenschein, Margarita Vassileva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Catharina VogtFachgebiet III.1 Kriminologie und interdisziplinäre Kriminalprävention Department Kriminal- und Rechtswissenschaften Deutsche Hochschule der Polizei, German Police University, Zum Roten Berge 18-24, 48165, Münster, Germany. catharina.vogt@dhpol.de.
Stefanie GiljohannDepartment of Clinical Radiology Research Group 'Cognition and Gender', Universität Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Natalie KöpselFachgebiet III.1 Kriminologie und interdisziplinäre Kriminalprävention Department Kriminal- und Rechtswissenschaften Deutsche Hochschule der Polizei, German Police University, Zum Roten Berge 18-24, 48165, Münster, Germany.
Sandra González CabezasAsociación Askabide Liberación, Calle Amparo, 1, Bilbao, 48003, Spain.
Jarmo HoutsonenPoliisiammattikorkeakoulu, (Vaajakatu 2), PO BOX 123, Tampere, FI-33721, Finland.
Ainhoa Izaguirre ChoperenaUniversidad de Deusto, Mundaiz 50, Donostia - San Sebastián, 20012, Spain.
Anna JuuselaWe Encourage Oy Ltd, Putousrinne 1 G, Vantaa, 01600, Finland.
Emanuel Tananau BlumenscheinVICESSE Research GmbH, Paulanergasse 4/8, Vienna, 1040, Austria.
Margarita VassilevaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Pacte/IEP - BP 48, Grenoble cedex 9, 38040, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvivors of domestic violence (DV) often encounter barriers when accessing professional support services. These barriers arise, for example, from uncertainty in identifying violence, limited knowledge of support options, and psychological barriers such as fear or shame. To address these challenges, the European project IMPROVE developed AinoAid™, a data-secure and multilingual website with an integrated chatbot. Developed in collaboration with psychotherapists, the chatbot provides low-threshold, anonymous, empathetic access to information on domestic violence support services, risk assessment and legal procedures. Ultimately, AinoAid™ seeks to serve as a safe, informative gateway to protection and support.

methodsEmploying a mixed-methods design, Study 1 involved interviews with 80 DV survivors from Austria, Germany, Finland, France and Spain to explore their openness and needs concerning an AI chatbot for 24/7 support. Furthermore, Study 2 was a German evaluation survey of 669 users, assessing perceived safety, usability, utility and interaction quality of AinoAid™.

resultsIn Study 1, interviewees predominantly reported limited prior chatbot experience, yet expressed remarkably positive attitudes toward the potential use of a chatbot tailored for DV support. They emphasized the importance of data safety, chatbot accessibility and usability, offering suggestions on chatbot content tone and promotion. The evaluation in Study 2 indicated a positive overall rating of the chatbot by users, with perceived safety emerging as the most highly rated feature. Study participants suggested improving the chatbot's empathy, engagement, input comprehension, follow-up integration, and memory of previous statements. Additionally, users called for more personalized information, actionable guidance and direct links to relevant support services.

conclusionsOur evaluation confirms that the AI chatbot AinoAid™ functions as a safe, accessible, and effective gateway to protection and support for DV survivors. Its perceived great strength, its impartiality due to its non-human nature, presents, on the other hand, also a significant challenge in meeting the high expectations for human-like, empathetic, and dynamic conversations in such a sensitive context. However, we anticipate that sustained usage and continuous training will even further enhance the AI ability to fully meet the evolving needs of domestic violence survivors.

Indexed as

Domestic ViolenceInternetNeeds AssessmentSocial SupportSurvivorsAdultAgedEuropeFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceBarrierChatbotsDomestic violenceHelp seekingIntimate partner violencePreventionPsycho-educationSupport systemTechnology-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID41388270
PMCPMC12817862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.