Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388268›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

The PLAN trial: precision treatment of lumbar spine surgery with advanced nerve root blockade - protocol for a prospective, investigator-initiated, randomized non-inferiority trial.

David Kocemba, Peter Andreas Andersen, Jakob Gram Carlsen, Mette Katrine Schulz, Bent Uhrbrand, Hanne Dinesen, Ronni Mikkelsen, Mathias Thygesen, Mikkel Mylius Rasmussen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06143813 (Precision Treatment of Lumbar Spine Surgery Through Advanced Nerve Root Blockade), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06143813 narecruitingnot on this map

Precision Treatment of Lumbar Spine Surgery Through Advanced Nerve Root Blockade

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2023 to 2027Enrolled180ConditionsRadiculopathy Lumbar, Radiculopathy Sacral, Herniated Disc, Foraminal StenosisArmsSelective nerve root block (SNRB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David KocembaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Davkoc@rm.dk.
Peter Andreas AndersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jakob Gram CarlsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mette Katrine SchulzPrivate Hospital Mølholm, Vejle, Denmark.
Bent UhrbrandPrivate Hospital Mølholm, Vejle, Denmark.
Hanne DinesenPrivate Hospital Mølholm, Vejle, Denmark.
Ronni MikkelsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mathias ThygesenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mikkel Mylius RasmussenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumbar radiculopathy, due to nerve root compression, leads to significant pain and functional impairment. Surgical decompression is a treatment option, but not all patients achieve good outcomes. This protocol for an ongoing randomized controlled trial aims to compare the outcomes of surgical planning with a diagnostic selective nerve root block and surgical planning without a diagnostic selective nerve root block (standard of care).

methodsThe PLAN trial is a multicenter, block-randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial that will enroll patients diagnosed with unilateral lumbar radiculopathy. Participants who have been deemed surgical candidates will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A will receive standard surgical decompression, while Group B will undergo selective nerve root block to determine what nerve root is causing the patient's pain, followed by surgical decompression or conservative management. The primary outcome measure is the difference in the Numerical Rating Scale for Leg Pain from baseline to 3 months with a non-inferiority margin of 1.6 points. Secondary outcomes are the difference in proportions of patients reaching ≥ 1.6 points on the Numerical Rating Scale for Leg Pain, the difference in scores and time course on Numerical Rating Score for Leg Pain and Back Pain, Short-Form 36, EuroQol-5D-3 L, and Oswestry Disability Index. Analysis will also be performed after 1 year.

conclusionThis trial seeks to provide high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of integrating selective nerve root blocks to guide surgical decompression or avoid surgery in treating lumbar radiculopathy. The findings aim to inform clinical decision-making and optimize patient outcomes.​

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov registration NCT06143813. Registration date November 9, 2023. Last update May 2, 2024, version 1.1.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalLumbar VertebraeNerve BlockPrecision MedicineRadiculopathySpinal Nerve RootsAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPain MeasurementProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicForaminal stenosisLateral recess stenosisLumbar disc herniationPatient-reported outcomesPLANRadiculopathyRandomized controlled trialSelective nerve root block

Identifiers

PMID41388268
PMCPMC12817601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.