Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388253›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025

Efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia in reducing postoperative adverse events for thoracoscopic pulmonary surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Ran Zhang, Yaqing Wu, Xiaoyi Wang, Weixin Zhang, Yi Feng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04507165 (The Effect of Opioid-free Anesthesia on Postoperative Analgesia-related Adverse Reactions in Lung Resection With Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Access), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04507165 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Effect of Opioid-free Anesthesia on Postoperative Analgesia-related Adverse Reactions in Lung Resection With Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Access: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University People's HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsOpioid Free AnesthesiaArmsParavertebral block+Anterior serratus plane block, opioid free anesthesia, opioid based anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ran ZhangPeking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China. 120396715@qq.com.
Yaqing WuPeking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Xiaoyi WangPeking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Weixin ZhangPeking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Yi FengPeking University People's Hospital, 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study compared the effects of opiate-free anesthesia (OFA) using thoracic paravertebral block combined with dexmedetomidine versus traditional anesthesia with sufentanil and remifentanil on postoperative adverse reactions after thoracoscopic lung surgery.

methodsA prospective, randomized, double-blind trial included 97 patients(49 in OFA group,48 in S group).All received preoperative thoracic paravertebral block.The primary outcome was the incidence of opioid-related adverse reactions (hypoxemia, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, dizziness) at 2,4,6,24,and 48 h postoperatively.Secondary outcomes included intraoperative events, pain scores, opioid consumption, time to first flatus/defecation, and cardiovascular complications.

resultsAt 2 h postoperatively, hypotension incidence was lower in the OFA group(8.2%vs 33.3%,P = 0.002),with fewer overall adverse reactions (18.4%vs 39.6%,P = 0.018).At 24 h, PONV was 0%in OFA vs. 10.4%in S group(P = 0.027),dizziness was 8.2%vs 22.9%(P = 0.041),and overall adverse reactions were 10.2%vs 27.1%(P = 0.029).OFA had fewer vasopressor applications (P < 0.001), lower 24-hour opioid use (P = 0.033), fewer analgesic pump presses(P = 0.004),and earlier first feeding (9.5 ± 3.8 h vs. 11.4 ± 4.7 h, P = 0.035).

conclusionOFA significantly reduced opioid-related adverse reactions, decreased vasopressor and opioid use, and improved recovery.However, the single-center, small-sample design limits generalizability, and multicenter validation is needed.

trial registrationThis randomized controlled trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT04507165; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04507165 , 11/08/2020).

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPostoperative ComplicationsThoracoscopyAdultAgedDexmedetomidineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRemifentanilSufentanilAnalgesics, OpioidDexmedetomidineRemifentanilSufentanilMultimodal analgesiaOpioid-Free anesthesia (OFA)Thoracic paravertebral blockThoracoscopic pulmonary surgery

Identifiers

PMID41388253
PMCPMC12699814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.