Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388246›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Evaluation of road infrastructure in Yerevan, Armenia through the lens of pedestrian and child safety: a school-based analysis.

Emily N Terian, Haig J Minasian, Jefrin Johny, Araksya Gevorgyan, Sharon A Chekijian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily N TerianDepartment of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave # MC5068, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. eterian@uchicagomedicine.org.
Haig J MinasianDepartment of Geography, California State University, 1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, CA, 90840, USA.
Jefrin JohnySchool of Medicine, Yerevan Haybusak Medical University, 6 Abelian St, Yerevan, Armenia.
Araksya GevorgyanDepartment of Data Science, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramyan Ave, Yerevan, Armenia.
Sharon A ChekijianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraffic-related injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, especially among children. In Armenia, traffic-related mortality rates are the second highest among European Union and former Soviet countries. Currently, there are no published studies on pedestrian safety in Armenia and no notable examinations of pedestrian safety infrastructure. This manuscript describes an audit of Armenia's infrastructure using a modified Inventory for Pedestrian Safety Infrastructure (IPSI) in the Yerevan city center, focusing on areas surrounding schools.

methodsIntersections (n = 379) and roadways (n = 623) shared by pedestrians and drivers in Yerevan's center were audited using a 36-item modified ISPI and paired with cloud-based smartphone application QField between October 2023 and February 2024. Visual analysis of data was conducted using the open-source software QGIS with statistical analysis in R. Inter-rater reliability of the audit was calculated using Cohen's Kappa and intra-class correlation coefficients. Incidence of each feature surrounding schools was compared to incidence overall using a one-sample z-test for continuous variables and a two-sample test of proportions for binary variables.

resultsMany of the features audited were not observed consistently across the audited area and were not more prevalent near schools. Lower inter-rater reliability was found with roadway and midblock data, resulting in analysis of primarily intersection features. Speed limits surrounding schools varied from 20 to 60 km/hr (12.5-37 mph). When compared to the overall audited area, crosswalks near schools demonstrated similar occurrence for traffic lights with crosswalk markings (23.3%, 95% CI: 0.157-0.309), speed bumps (11.9%, 95% CI: -0.139- 0.0338), and pedestrian signals (12.9%, 95% CI: 0.0709-0.194). Of the analyzed items, only bus stops were observed significantly more often near schools (19%, 95% CI: 0.00930-0.220).

conclusionsThe audit revealed an inconsistent presence of safety infrastructure, with infrastructure near schools largely reflecting the overall audited area. However, analysis was limited by low inter-rater reliability for many roadway and midblock features audited. Based on these results, infrastructure changes targeting lower speed limits and increased traffic calming measures are recommended to improve safety in school zones. Given a paucity of studies in LMICs, further work must be done to identify which high-yield features should be targeted in LMICs to prevent injury.

Indexed as

Child safetyGlobal injuryPedestrian safetyQGISSafety infrastructureTraffic injury

Identifiers

PMID41388246
PMCPMC12817759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.