ArticleBMC genomics2025
NaMeco - Nanopore full-length 16S rRNA gene reads clustering and annotation.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gut microbiome alterations are sex-dependently associated with brain abnormalities in a mouse model of Neurofibromatosis type I.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNanopore sequencing is currently one of the leading third-generation sequencing technologies on the market and is gaining popularity among researchers. Due to its long-read capabilities, full-length 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers great potential for metataxonomic studies. However, the relatively high error rate poses a significant challenge for bioinformatic processing, often limiting taxonomy resolution to the genus level despite the longer read length.
resultsThis study presents NaMeco, a novel tool specifically developed to efficiently process long 16S rRNA gene reads sequenced using Oxford Nanopore Technologies, requiring minimal user input. Our tool performs read quality control, primer-specific extraction of sequences and their clustering, followed by taxonomic annotation with percent identity thresholds that minimize the amount of false-positive annotations. It produces several outputs: a table of cluster counts, taxonomic annotations of clusters, their representative sequences in fasta format and taxa counts at each taxonomy rank. Output files are compatible with the Qiime2 pipeline and can be imported into the required format for downstream analyses.
conclusionsNaMeco, in combination with the full SSU GTDB database, outperforms existing tools such as NanoCLUST and EPI2ME, while delivering taxonomy accuracy and detection rates comparable to Emu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.