ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
PancreaSeq Genomic Classifier (PancreaSeq GC) Improves Pancreatic Cyst Classification and Detection of Advanced Neoplasia: A Multi-institutional Validation Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing on Surgical Decision-Making in Branch-Duct IPMN.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Cancer Risk After Initial Surveillance of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMNs): Are We Missing the Window for Prevention?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- DNA/RNA-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Improves the Early Diagnosis and Management of Neoplastic Bile Duct Strictures: A 6-Year, Prospective, Multi-Institutional, Real-Time Study.Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- A bibliometric analysis of research trends and future directions in early detection of pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Pancreatic cystic lesions: position paper of the SIRM-AISP multidisciplinary group.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Establishing a standardized robotic approach for technetium-99 m-defined sentinel lymph node dissection with indocyanine green-guided navigation in da Vinci Xi & SP system.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
59 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe preoperative classification of pancreatic cysts and detection of advanced neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia/pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]) represents a significant diagnostic challenge. A prospective, multi-institutional study found that DNA-based testing (PancreaSeq) of pancreatic cyst fluid (PCF) improved the assessment of pancreatic cysts. Notable imitations to PancreaSeq necessitated the development of a DNA/RNA-based panel called PancreaSeq Genomic Classifier (GC). We validated PancreaSeq GC on a prospective patient cohort. PATIENTS AND
methodsPancreaSeq GC was blindly tested on a prospective cohort of 241 patients with diagnostic follow-up. The performance of PancreaSeq GC in this cohort, which included 186 mucinous cysts (97 with advanced neoplasia), was benchmarked against traditional diagnostics and its DNA-only predecessor, PancreaSeq.
resultsPancreaSeq GC achieved 94.6% sensitivity and 96.4% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.955) for mucinous cysts. In comparison, increased fluid viscosity, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and PancreaSeq testing had lower sensitivities (71.4-88.2%) and lower AUC (0.824-0.941); however, PancreaSeq specificity was 100%. McNemar's test demonstrated higher sensitivity of PancreaSeq GC versus PancreaSeq for mucinous cysts (p < 0.001). For advanced neoplasia, PancreaSeq GC had 86.6% sensitivity and 97.9% specificity (AUC of 0.923), with McNemar's test confirming improved sensitivity over PancreaSeq (p = 0.031). Worrisome features, malignant cytopathology, and high-risk stigmata had lower sensitivities (44.3-84.5%) and lower AUC (0.604-0.892), while PancreaSeq had identical specificity to PancreaSeq GC. PancreaSeq GC had high accuracy in classifying intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms (IOPNs), intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms (ITPNs), and cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (cPanNETs), with 97.1-100% sensitivity and 100% specificity.
conclusionsThis validation study demonstrates statistically significant improvements in PancreaSeq GC for mucinous cysts and advanced neoplasia, establishing it as a clinically valuable tool for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cysts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.