SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
The biopsy dilemma in spinal infections: timing of antibiotics and diagnostic yield.
Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When infection becomes architecture: structural predictors of surgical management in spondylodiscitis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Infectious Spondylodiscitis of Bacterial Causes in Adults: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges.Microorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEstablishing a microbiological diagnosis is critical in managing spinal infections, yet culture yields from biopsy are inconsistent and may be influenced by prior antibiotic therapy. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of pre-biopsy antibiotic exposure on microbiological yield and to compare diagnostic performance across biopsy modalities.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus) were searched through June 2025. Eligible studies included adult and paediatric patients with suspected or confirmed spinal infection undergoing CT-guided, fluoroscopy-guided, or open biopsy. The primary outcome was microbiological yield (culture positivity) stratified by antibiotic exposure. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Pooled relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models.
resultsThirty-eight studies involving over 2,000 patients were included. Nine comparative studies (n = 796) assessed the effect of antibiotics. Culture yield was significantly lower in antibiotic-exposed patients (39.2%) compared with unexposed (59.6%) (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63–0.86, p = 0.0001), with the greatest reduction observed within 72 h of initiation. Open biopsy demonstrated the highest yield (76.1%) compared with CT-guided biopsy (50.0%) (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.57–0.76, p < 0.00001). No significant difference was found between CT-guided and fluoroscopy-guided techniques. Aggregate non-comparative yields were 44.1% for CT-guided, 37.0% for fluoroscopy-guided, and 84.2% for open biopsy.
conclusionPrior antibiotic therapy reduces microbiological yield in spinal infection, particularly within the first 72 h. Open surgical biopsy provides superior diagnostic accuracy compared with percutaneous techniques, even in antibiotic-exposed patients. A biopsy-first strategy should be prioritised in stable patients, with early surgical consultation when empirical antibiotics cannot be delayed. These findings should be interpreted in the context of the predominantly retrospective evidence base and the inconsistent reporting of microbiological methods across studies. Standardised microbiological protocols and further prospective research are warranted to refine biopsy timing and technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41388113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.