ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
A novel enhanced two-tooth clip for reliable defect closure endoscopically: An ex vivo comparative and in vivo feasibility study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07581977 (Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Two-Tooth Clip-Assisted ESD and EFTR of GIST), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Two-Tooth Clip-Assisted ESD and EFTR of GIST: A Single-Center, Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSecure closure after advanced endoscopic resection remains challenging, especially for large or full-thickness gastrointestinal (GI) defects. We developed a novel two-tooth clip (TTC) with enhanced anchoring capacity and evaluated its mechanical properties, tissue attachment, and clinical feasibility.
methodsThe TTC features inward-facing teeth for improved grip. Its performance was compared with conventional clips through tensile testing and finite element simulation. In vivo clip retention and histologic response were assessed in porcine models. Feasibility was further evaluated in pigs and clinical cases requiring mucosal defect closure.
resultsThe TTC exhibited significantly greater pulling force than conventional clips (4.64 ± 0.11 N vs. 2.05 ± 0.09 N; P < 0.05) and showed more distributed force transmission on simulation. In animal studies, TTCs demonstrated higher retention and good tissue compatibility. In clinical cases, technical and clinical success were achieved in 9 of 10 patients (90.0%), with complete closure of defects up to 6 × 3 cm and no delayed perforation.
conclusionsThe TTC system is safe, effective, and compatible with standard endoscopic workflows. Its dual-tooth design offers enhanced closure strength and stability. Further comparative studies are needed to confirm its clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41388104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.