ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Mucin phenotype-based deep learning framework for intestinal metaplasia-carcinogenesis progression prediction.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stage-Specific Mucin Reprogramming Across the Gastric Cancer Cascade: Unveiling Molecular Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Vulnerabilities.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Overview of Gastric Cancer Immunohistochemistry: Key Biomarkers, Advanced Detection Methods, and Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study decodes spatiotemporal mucin dynamics in gastric carcinogenesis, revealing gastric-type markers (MUC5AC/MUC6) decline progressively while intestinal-type markers (MUC2/CD10) peak in gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) before decreasing in gastric cancer (GC). We developed MPMR, a dual-function UNI-pretrained Vision Transformer (ViT) model, which directly predicts four mucin markers from H&E whole-slide images with near-perfect accuracy (AUC: 0.921-0.997) and generates interpretable simulated staining heatmaps via adversarial learning. Integrating these outputs with clinical variables, the MPMR-IMCP risk model significantly outperformed clinical-only models (ΔAUC = 0.050), enabling both phenotype analysis and GIM risk stratification without specialized staining. Validated in longitudinal cohorts from Chinese GC high-incidence regions, this framework offers an efficient solution for monitoring GIM malignant transformation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.