Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388065›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Integrating chemical modification pathways and machine learning for optimization of nitrate removal by rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) biochar.

Laleh Divband Hafshejani, Mehri Saeidinia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laleh Divband HafshejaniDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. l.divband@scu.ac.ir.
Mehri SaeidiniaDepartment of Water Engineering, Agriculture Faculty, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrate contamination from agricultural and industrial activities poses significant risks to human health and aquatic ecosystems. Biochar, particularly when chemically modified, has emerged as a sustainable and effective adsorbent; however, the influence of modification sequence and operational conditions on nitrate removal is not fully understood. In this study, rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)-derived biochars were modified with aluminum through three distinct pathways: pre-pyrolysis (MP), post-pyrolysis (PM), and post-pyrolysis with re-pyrolysis (PMP). Comprehensive characterization using BET, SEM, EDS, XRD, and FTIR showed that PM biochar exhibited the highest surface area, uniform mesoporous structure, stable aluminum content, and abundant oxygen-containing functional groups, resulting in superior nitrate adsorption. Batch experiments demonstrated that adsorption efficiency is strongly affected by operational parameters, including initial nitrate concentration, contact time, adsorbent dose, solution pH, and the presence of competing anions, with CO₃

Indexed as

Brassica napusCharcoalMachine LearningNitratesWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationAdsorptionPyrolysisbiocharCharcoalNitratesWater Pollutants, ChemicalNitrate removalPyrolysisSurface modificationWater treatment

Identifiers

PMID41388065
PMCPMC12775513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.