ArticleScientific reports2025
Considering AEWMA control chart applied to Gamma-distributed data with fixed and variable sampling intervals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Control charts are widely used in manufacturing and quality management to monitor process variability. Although easy to implement, the Shewhart control chart lacks sensitivity to small process shifts. The exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control chart is effective in detecting minor shifts, but responds slowly to sudden changes. To enhance the detection capability, this study adopts the adaptive EWMA (AEWMA) control chart, which features dynamic adjustment mechanisms to improve the monitoring performance. This is applicable for skewed process data, particularly those following a Gamma distribution such as lifetime data, waiting times, and current stability indicators in semiconductor manufacturing. The Wilson-Hilferty transformation was applied to approximate the normality before constructing the AEWMA control chart. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to design and evaluate both the fixed sampling interval (FSI) and variable sampling interval (VSI) schemes under various combinations of shapes, scale parameters, and smoothing constants. To address the limitations of the traditional average run length (ARL) in reflecting the differences in sampling schemes, this study also adopted the average time-to-signal (ATS) as a performance metric. The simulation results demonstrated that the AEWMA VSI chart outperformed both the AEWMA FSI and EWMA charts in terms of sensitivity and stability when detecting small process shifts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.