ArticleScientific reports2025
Genes, shells, and AI: using computer vision to detect cryptic morphological divergence between genetically distinct populations of limpets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Speeding up taxonomy in the digital age: A deep learning approach for identifying cryptic freshwater snails.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many species are composed of two or more genetically distinct clades, indicating ongoing or past evolutionary divergence. Often however, there are no obvious morphological differences between clades, making it difficult to accurately assess specific aspects of biodiversity or to enact targeted conservation efforts. New advancements in artificial intelligence tools can be used to categorise individuals into their respective genetic clades and to highlight their distinguishing morphological characters that would otherwise be hidden from human observers. Here, we applied computer vision and explainable artificial intelligence techniques to four limpet species that display well-defined phylogeographic breaks along the Baja California and California coasts. A fine-tuned convolutional network, trained and evaluated over 100 resampling iterations, classified individuals into their genetic clades with median F1-scores of up to 0.96. F1-score performance was markedly higher for true clade groups than the controlled mixed-groups, confirming the presence of features specific to the clades. Saliency maps consistently emphasised structures such as the keyhole in Fissurella volcano and the ridge tips in Lottia conus as distinguishing features, and subsequent shape analyses confirmed significant divergence between clades. These results demonstrate the power of computer vision and explainable artificial intelligence to expose otherwise cryptic morphological diversity and provide a scalable, reproducible workflow that can broaden the biodiversity toolkit and refine eco-evolutionary research across taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.