ArticleScientific reports2025
Linking walkability and pedestrian crossing safety using simulated urban environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Walking is the most environmentally sustainable mode of transport, offering wide-ranging physical, mental, and ecological benefits. Yet, pedestrian safety remains a critical concern in urban environments. We examined the relationship between pedestrian crossing behaviour and walkability through two complementary stages. In the first stage, we developed a localised Walkability Index by integrating environmental and street design features, weighted by 52 subject matter experts (SMEs). In the experimental stage, we empirically examined 47 participants for road-crossing decisions under controlled conditions by exposing them to real-world panoramic traffic video scenes in a semi-immersive dome environment. Pedestrians' crossing-performance differences among scenarios were pronounced in missed crossing opportunities and response times, demonstrating walkability effects on pedestrian behaviour and safety. Further, participants rated the street images for perceived pleasantness. Ratings were compatible with the walkability index scores, supporting its internal validity. Our findings suggest that targeted urban design may reduce decision latency and exposure to traffic hazards. We propose a preliminary theoretical model, contextualising how walkability constructs impact pedestrians' decisions within a local road crossing context. This study advances understanding of the built environment's role in shaping pedestrian safety behaviour and strengthens the need for evidence-based urban design policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.