ArticleScientific reports2025
Passive determination of anisotropic compressive strength of 3D printed concrete using multiple neural networks enhanced with explainable machine learning (XML).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Objective Optimization and Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Green Basalt Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Using Evolutionary ML Algorithms.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of compressive strength in 3d printed fiber reinforced concrete using support vector regression and artificial neural networks with shapley additive explanations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D Concrete Printing (3DCP) offers significant advantages over traditional construction such as faster construction time, reduced material wastage, and enhanced ability to execute complex architectural designs. The incorporation of various fibres and industrial wastes into 3DCP can improve performance and sustainability but introduces non-linear effects on compressive strength (CS) that are difficult to predict with standard laboratory methods. This study aims to develop reliable prediction models for the CS of 3DCP by employing advanced neural network and deep learning algorithms such as Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Radial Basis Functional Neural Network (RBFNN). A comprehensive database of 200 experimental instances of CS of 3DCP was collected from published literature. The database includes mixture constituents of 3DCP as inputs and CS as the output. The trained algorithms were validated by means of k-fold validation, error metrics, and residual assessment. Among the tested algorithms, the CNN model exhibited the highest predictive performance with a testing R² value of 0.95, demonstrating its robustness in modelling the complex behaviour of 3DCP. To enhance interpretability, Shapley (SHAP) and Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) analyses were performed, identifying the water-to-cement ratio, loading direction, and fibre content as key factors influencing compressive strength. Finally, a graphical user interface (GUI) has been developed for stakeholders to implement the findings of this study practically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.