Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387957›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Scaling deep learning for material imaging with a pseudo 3D model for domain transfer.

Kunning Tang, Ryan T Armstrong, Peyman Mostaghimi, Yufu Niu, Quentin Meyer, Chuan Zhao, Donal P Finegan, Melissa Popeil, Kamaljit Singh, Hannah Menke and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kunning TangSchool of Minerals and Energy Resources Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-3097
Ryan T ArmstrongSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-7902
Peyman MostaghimiSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yufu NiuSchool of Minerals and Energy Resources Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Quentin MeyerSchool of Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6418-9680
Chuan ZhaoSchool of Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-5946
Donal P FineganNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4633-560X
Melissa PopeilNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA.
Kamaljit SinghInstitute of GeoEnergy Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7560-7964
Hannah MenkeInstitute of GeoEnergy Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Alexandros Patsoukis DimouInstitute of GeoEnergy Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Tom BultreysCentre for X-ray Tomography and Department of Geology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-8053
Arjen MasciniCentre for X-ray Tomography and Department of Geology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Mark KnackstedtDepartment of Materials Physics, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Ying Da WangSchool of Minerals and Energy Resources Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. yingda.wang@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0370-4751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent introduction of deep learning methods for image processing has greatly advanced the characterization of materials using three-dimensional (3D) X-ray imaging techniques. However, deep learning models often have difficulty performing consistently across images owing to unavoidable variations in imaging conditions, which create inconsistencies even for the same material. As a result, networks must frequently be retrained for new datasets, limiting their applicability and generalization. Thus, it is critical to reduce the variations between images to enable a single model to process multiple datasets. Herein, we introduce P3T-Net, a pseudo-3D domain transfer network that transfers diverse 3D images into a uniform domain before processing using deep learning models. Remarkably, P3T-Net enables the reuse of previously trained networks for processing new images and considerably reduces the computational cost of transferring 3D images across domains. These unique capabilities were demonstrated in the following scenarios: (i) image enhancement of fast scans for geological rock and hydrogen fuel cells, (ii) enhancement of images to match the quality of multi-source imaging for lithium-ion batteries, (iii) accurate segmentation of images captured under different conditions, and (iv) tera-scale 3D transfer (10

Identifiers

PMID41387957
PMCPMC12722266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.