ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification and removal of contamination in palaeoproteomic analysis of dental enamel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of archaeological and palaeontological dental enamel allows for the study of taxonomy, phylogenetic relationships, and genetic sex of Pleistocene fauna and hominin remains. However, high-quality data is required for the study of degraded, chemically modified ancient proteomes. Protein contamination may hinder acquisition of such data due to the abundance and more intact state of modern contaminating proteins, risking suppression of low-abundance, damaged peptides during fragment ion spectrum acquisition, quantitative distortions of proteome composition, and the potential of introducing taxonomic misassignments. Here, we artificially contaminate a Pleistocene woolly rhinoceros tooth in order to investigate decontamination of archaeological dental enamel. We find that although the contaminating proteins are not identified, likely due to a lack of denaturation and digestion steps in archaeological dental enamel protein extraction protocols, contamination leads to significant loss of endogenous proteomic information. We thereafter compare five published decontamination methods, and find that a simple water or bleach wash prior to demineralization is the most efficient at removing protein contamination. The water wash does not affect the endogenous proteome, while a bleach wash may lead to a loss of shorter intercrystalline peptides. We therefore conclude that decontamination is necessary in the study of ancient dental enamel, to ensure maximal retrieval of endogenous proteomic information, and that this can easily be achieved by incorporating a water or bleach wash step into the protein extraction protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.