ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Prevalence and risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Radiographers: a proposed systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Professional Interpreter Use in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWork-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) are significant health concerns among Radiographers, arising from ergonomic challenges, repetitive tasks, and the physical demands of their profession. These conditions contribute to pain, disability, and reduced productivity, emphasizing the need for targeted prevention and management strategies. Despite the growing recognition of WRMSDs, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses have comprehensively synthesized the prevalence and associated risk factors among Radiographers.
methodThis systematic review and meta-analysis will investigate the prevalence of WRMSDs and identify key risk factors in Radiographers. Six electronic databases will be searched from inception to June 2025, using predefined inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists. Pooled prevalence estimates and risk factor analyses will be performed using meta-analytic techniques, with heterogeneity assessed using Cochran's Q test and I DISCUSSION: The findings of this review will give critical insights into the burden and underlying causes of WRMSDs within this occupational group, emphasizing the need for supporting evidence-based interventions and workplace modifications to enhance their health and productivity. Additionally, this review is expected to inform policy development in the healthcare sector, guiding the implementation of ergonomic equipment design, workplace health promotion strategies, and targeted training programs. By addressing these challenges, the review will support a comprehensive approach to enhance occupational health and fostering a safe, more efficient work environment for Radiographers. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42024565835.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.