ArticleParasites & vectors2025
Vector competence of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti from the islands of the Southwestern Indian Ocean for epidemic Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti are key vectors involved in the transmission of human pathogens worldwide. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated varying levels of arbovirus transmission by these mosquito vectors, leading to an increasing number of investigations that assess vector competence (the ability of an insect to become infected and subsequently transmit a pathogen) of Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti lines, to decipher the risks associated with each species. In this study, we evaluated the vector competence of Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti lines from the Southwestern Indian Ocean (SWIO) for three arboviruses: Zika virus (ZIKV), dengue virus serotype-1 (DENV-1), and chikungunya virus (CHIKV).
methodsTen mosquito lines (eight Ae. albopictus and two Ae. aegypti lines), collected from five islands within SWIO (the Seychelles, the Comoros, and the Mascarene archipelagoes), were exposed to epidemic strains of ZIKV, DENV-1, and CHIKV. Three vector competence parameters (infection rate [IR], dissemination efficiency [DE], and transmission efficiency [TE]) were assessed at different days post exposure (dpe) to infectious blood meals, using plaque forming unit (PFU) assays. In addition, viral loads were quantified in positive saliva. These parameters were then compared between mosquito lines, geographic origins, and dpe for each virus.
resultsNone of the mosquito lines were competent for the ZIKV strain tested. In contrast, both Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti lines were competent vectors for the strains of DENV-1 and CHIKV tested, with transmission efficiencies reaching 35.4% for DENV-1 and 62.5% for CHIKV. For both mosquito species, statistical analyses revealed that dpe significantly influenced vector competence parameters, whereas the geographic origin of mosquito lines did not.
conclusionsThe observed vector competence patterns for the three tested viruses might partly explain their current epidemiology in the SWIO. This approach should involve a larger number of Ae. aegypti lines and should be extended to other ZIKV, DENV, and CHIKV strains, as well as to viruses not currently reported in the region, to better assess the risk of (re-)emergence of mosquito-borne viruses in the SWIO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.