ArticleBiomedical engineering online2025
A novel sensor-based real-time tracking game for assessing ankle proprioceptive effects on sensorimotor performance.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proprioceptive deficits have been linked to balance and risk of falling in older adults. In this study, we assessed the effects of proprioceptive deficits on sensorimotor performance using a sensor-based real-time tracking game (SRT) that utilizes a moving target on a screen. The current methods to measure proprioceptive deficits can be difficult to use and may not be sensitive to minor deficits. We recruited 19 young participants (mean age = 21.8 ± 1.32, 55% female) and 10 older adults (age = 73.6 ± 7.73, 60% female). We placed a gyroscope on the top of the intermediate cuneiform bone to track movements. Both legs were tested with three separate SRT tracks with different difficulties. To disturb visuo-proprioceptive performance, we applied vibration to the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, soleus, and gastrocnemius. We hypothesized that younger participants would score better than older participants, the dominant ankle would perform better than the non-dominant ankle, and participants would perform better without vibratory stimulation. We measured the amplitude and directional accuracy of the performance. Amplitude accuracy was measured by calculating the straight-line distance from the tracker to predetermined track. Directional accuracy was defined as the percentage of time the participant remained in the free zone (defined by average performance among the young sample) at every instant of time. Results showed significant effects for amplitude and directional accuracy by age (p < 0.001), vibration condition (p < 0.012), and testing side (p < 0.026). Our results showed that SRT is sensitive enough to measure effects of visuo-proprioception changes caused by aging, dominant vs. non-dominant sides, and outside disturbance. Through accurate detection of visuo-proprioceptive deficits, we may potentially identify risk of falling associated with such deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.