Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387866›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Toxoplasma gondii in wild felides in Poland.

Anna Didkowska, Marta Kołodziej-Sobocińska, Katarzyna Matusik, Krzysztof Schmidt, Daniel Klich, Ewelina Kwiecień, Stanisław Kaczor, Piotr Kwieciński, Jacek Karamon, Jacek Sroka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna DidkowskaDepartment of Food Hygiene and Public Health Protection, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159 St., Warsaw, 02-787, Poland. anna_didkowska@sggw.edu.pl.
Marta Kołodziej-SobocińskaMammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Stoczek 1, Białowieża, 17-230, Poland.
Katarzyna MatusikDepartment of Food Hygiene and Public Health Protection, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159 St., Warsaw, 02-787, Poland.
Krzysztof SchmidtMammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Stoczek 1, Białowieża, 17-230, Poland.
Daniel KlichInstitute of Animal Sciences, University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.
Ewelina KwiecieńDepartment of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Ciszewskiego 8 St., Warsaw, 02-786, Poland.
Stanisław KaczorCounty Veterinary Inspectorate, Młynarska 45, Sanok, 38-500, Poland.
Piotr KwiecińskiVet-Lab Brudzew, Ul. Turkowska 58C, Brudzew, 62-720, Poland.
Jacek KaramonDepartment of Parasitology and Invasive Diseases, Bee Diseases and Aquatic Animal Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Partyzantow Avenue 57, Pulawy, 24-100, Poland.
Jacek SrokaDepartment of Parasitology and Invasive Diseases, Bee Diseases and Aquatic Animal Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Partyzantow Avenue 57, Pulawy, 24-100, Poland. jacek.sroka@piwet.pulawy.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToxoplasma gondii is a globally distributed protozoan parasite that infects a wide range of warm-blooded vertebrates, including humans. Felids, as definitive hosts, play a central role in its transmission through shedding of environmentally resistant oocysts. While numerous studies on domestic cats exist, less is known about the epidemiology of T. gondii in wild felids, particularly in Central Europe. In Poland, two strictly protected carnivore species—the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) and the European wildcat (Felis silvestris)—may contribute to parasite circulation, yet no data on their infection status were previously available. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of T. gondii in these species and to explore the genotypes present in Polish populations.

resultsSamples (sera/tissue fluid and fragments of organs) from 29 wild felines (21 lynx, 8 wildcats) collected across three regions of Poland were analyzed using serological (ELISA) and molecular (nested and real-time PCR) methods. Specific IgG antibodies were detected in 14/25 (56%) individuals, while IgM was identified in two wildcats, suggesting recent infection. T. gondii DNA was confirmed in 11/27 (40.7%) animals by nested PCR and in 10/27 (37.0%) by real-time PCR, with concordant results (Cramer's V test, p = 0.018). Parasite DNA was recovered from multiple tissues, most frequently the heart, lungs, spleen, and brain. Genotyping of positive samples revealed predominance of type II lineages (82.6%), followed by type I (13.0%) and type II/III (4.3%).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that both Eurasian lynx and European wildcats in Poland are frequently exposed to and infected with T. gondii, confirming their role in the parasite’s sylvatic cycle. The predominance of type II genotypes mirrors patterns in Central European domestic cats and livestock, suggesting shared transmission pathways. Given the conservation concerns for these endangered species and their ecological importance, systematic surveillance of T. gondii and other pathogens in wild felids, as well as in their prey, is recommended. These data expand the understanding of parasite circulation in Central Europe and highlight potential health risks for vulnerable carnivore populations.

Indexed as

FelisLynxToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalAnimalsAnimals, WildAntibodies, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanFemaleGenotypeMalePolandPrevalenceAntibodies, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanFelis silvestrisGenotypingLynx lynxSerologyToxoplasmosisWildlife

Identifiers

PMID41387866
PMCPMC12817859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.