Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387861›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Exploring nurse-patient mutuality in inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Daniele Napolitano, Silvia Cilluffo, Alessia Marini, Maura Lusignani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniele NapolitanoCEMAD, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Daniele.napolitano@policlinicogemelli.it.
Silvia CilluffoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alessia MariniDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Maura LusignaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation ID 9C67A07D-92CD-49AA-AA43-22266255E23B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), require long-term, multidisciplinary care. Within this model, the nurse-patient relationship is essential, yet little is known about mutuality-defined as shared trust, collaboration, and reciprocity. This study assessed nurse-patient mutuality in IBD using the Nurse-Patient Mutuality in Chronic Illness (NPM-CI) scale.

methodsA multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in Italian IBD centers. Adult outpatients with confirmed IBD completed the NPM-CI patient version, a 20-item validated tool assessing three dimensions: developing and going beyond, being a point of reference, and deciding and sharing care. Descriptive statistics were used.

resultsAmong 453 patients, 449 (94%) completed the NPM-CI. The mean total score was high (81.2 ± 13.3). UC patients reported higher scores than CD patients. The highest-rated items concerned respect for privacy and attention to well-being, while lower scores reflected limited emotional sharing and clarification of information from other professionals.

conclusionsThis is the first study to evaluate nurse-patient mutuality in IBD using a validated tool. Findings highlight the central role of IBD nurses in building therapeutic relationships. Enhancing emotional communication and shared decision-making could further strengthen mutuality and improve care outcomes.

Indexed as

Cross-sectional studyInflammatory bowel diseaseMutualityNurse-patient relationshipPatient-centered healthcare modelPatient outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID41387861
PMCPMC12817773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.