ArticleBMC health services research2025
Do discharge delays explain longer stays at veterans health administration hospitals?
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDischarge delays are difficult to quantify without standardized indicators for when patients are medically ready for discharge. We aimed to estimate the proportion of increased hospital length of stay attributable to discharge delays, as proxied by increases in 'avoidable' days.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of Veterans Health Administration hospitals in the continental United States with emergency departments between 1 March 2019 and 28 February 2023. We included Veterans who were discharged from an acute medicine service without a COVID-19 diagnosis. We used standardized utilization management criteria to count 'avoidable' days, defined as hospital days when acute care was no longer required. Our primary outcome was geometric mean length of the discharging stay (the final acute medicine segment prior to discharge), which reflects the time most susceptible to discharge delays.
resultsDuring the study period there were 868,031 eligible hospitalizations. Adjusted geometric mean length of discharging stay increased 9.3% (95% CI, 8.7% to 9.9%) from the pre-pandemic year to the third pandemic year, with the largest increase among discharges to facility-based post-acute care (23.3% [95% CI, 21.6 to 24.9%]). However, among all hospitalizations only 16% (95% CI, 15 to 17%) of the increase in discharging stay was attributable to an increase in avoidable days.
conclusionsMost of the increase in length of hospital discharging stay was not explained by discharge delays and may instead reflect longer periods of acute care delivery. Improving acute care processes may more effectively reduce hospital capacity strain than bolstering post-acute care availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.