ArticleBMC biology2025
Genomic identification of direct seeding and evolutionary lineages by combining heterogeneous genomic resources.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman-induced habitat changes threaten biodiversity, prompting large-scale restoration initiatives. Revegetation through direct seeding is common in agricultural and infrastructure construction projects, yet the provenance of seed material and its genetic impacts on natural populations remain underexplored. Introducing foreign ecotypes can lead to unintended consequences, as they may be adapted to different environmental conditions or represent distinct evolutionary lineages. In Switzerland, direct seeding is widely used to promote dry meadows, often using seeds of the Carthusian pink (Dianthus carthusianorum).
resultsTo assess the extent and genetic effects of direct seeding and infer seed provenances, we combined genomic data from 446 samples collected in independent, smaller-scale studies. We assembled a chromosome-level reference genome to map reads and developed a panel of 48,299 representative single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We identified six evolutionary significant units (ESUs) within the European distribution range of D. carthusianorum. As biodiversity promotion efforts are often coordinated nationally, we focused on populations in Switzerland, where we found five ESUs: four occur naturally, and one was introduced from Eastern Europe. Our combined genomic data revealed that 15 of 31 randomly sampled populations across Switzerland (48.4%) originated from direct seeding. Allochthonous seed material was detected in eight populations (25.8%), with six of these showing admixture involving two to three ESUs.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate the effectiveness of genomic approaches for identifying direct seeding and clarifying seed provenance, thereby supporting decision-making in national revegetation projects and emphasising the importance of using autochthonous seed sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.