Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387836›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Using routine blood tests to predict severe immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Caner Acar, Fatma Pinar Açar, Gökhan Şahin, Haydar Çağatay Yüksel, Burçak Karaca, Erdem Göker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caner AcarDivision of Medical Oncology, Departmant of Internal Medicine, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, 35100, Turkey. acar.caner@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-6807
Fatma Pinar AçarDivision of Medical Oncology, Departmant of Internal Medicine, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, 35100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2749-8732
Gökhan ŞahinDivision of Medical Oncology, Departmant of Internal Medicine, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, 35100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1478-9383
Haydar Çağatay YükselDivision of Medical Oncology, Departmant of Internal Medicine, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, 35100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-2983
Burçak KaracaDivision of Medical Oncology, Departmant of Internal Medicine, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, 35100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2638-1625
Erdem GökerDivision of Medical Oncology, Departmant of Internal Medicine, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, 35100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6180-713X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve the outcomes across solid tumours, although they can cause severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Due to this possibility of side effects, practical and low-cost predictors of severe irAEs are needed to guide patient monitoring and care.

methodsWe conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study involving 593 patients who were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy from June 2016 to November 2024. The primary endpoint was the time to the first severe irAE (grade ≥ 3). Peripheral blood biomarkers were evaluated at baseline and immediately before the cycle 3. The cumulative incidence was estimated, and the associations were quantified using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards ratio (sHR) model in a competing risks framework.

resultsOverall, 11.6% of patients experienced a severe irAE, with the median time to the first event being 12 weeks and the most frequent severe irAE being colitis (n = 21; 3.5%). Combination therapy was associated with a higher risk when compared with monotherapy (sHR 3.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25-6.13). Baseline eosinophils > 250/µL were associated with an increased risk (sHR 2.22, 95% CI 1.35-3.65). A lower red cell distribution width (RDW) was likewise associated with the risk at two timepoints: baseline RDW ≤ 15.8% (sHR 2.60, 95% CI 1.35-5.01) and pre-cycle 3 RDW ≤ 14.3% (sHR 2.71, 95% CI 1.44-5.09). The effects were directionally consistent across subgroups, and no interactions were detected. The other blood biomarkers tested were not significant (all p > 0.05).

conclusionsA high baseline eosinophil count and a lower RDW early on during therapy identify patients at increased risk of severe irAEs. These accessible measures could support personalised monitoring and biomarker-guided patient selection. However, external validation is needed to confirm the robustness and validate the thresholds identified in this study prior to clinical use.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHematologic TestsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBiomarkersCumulative incidenceEosinophilFine-gray competing riskImmunotherapyRed cell distribution width

Identifiers

PMID41387836
PMCPMC12817496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.