ArticleBMC cancer2025
Using routine blood tests to predict severe immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Long-Term Sequelae and Clinical Workload Resulting from Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapy in Patients with Cancer.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Impact of baseline nutritional and inflammatory markers on safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a retrospective, monocentric study.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Toward nursing-integrated biomarker surveillance for immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Case Report: Successful treatment of steroid-refractory severe immunotherapy-induced pneumonitis with equine antithymocyte globulin.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Identification of Prognostic Clinical Features in Grade 4 Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Triangulation Study.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve the outcomes across solid tumours, although they can cause severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Due to this possibility of side effects, practical and low-cost predictors of severe irAEs are needed to guide patient monitoring and care.
methodsWe conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study involving 593 patients who were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy from June 2016 to November 2024. The primary endpoint was the time to the first severe irAE (grade ≥ 3). Peripheral blood biomarkers were evaluated at baseline and immediately before the cycle 3. The cumulative incidence was estimated, and the associations were quantified using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards ratio (sHR) model in a competing risks framework.
resultsOverall, 11.6% of patients experienced a severe irAE, with the median time to the first event being 12 weeks and the most frequent severe irAE being colitis (n = 21; 3.5%). Combination therapy was associated with a higher risk when compared with monotherapy (sHR 3.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25-6.13). Baseline eosinophils > 250/µL were associated with an increased risk (sHR 2.22, 95% CI 1.35-3.65). A lower red cell distribution width (RDW) was likewise associated with the risk at two timepoints: baseline RDW ≤ 15.8% (sHR 2.60, 95% CI 1.35-5.01) and pre-cycle 3 RDW ≤ 14.3% (sHR 2.71, 95% CI 1.44-5.09). The effects were directionally consistent across subgroups, and no interactions were detected. The other blood biomarkers tested were not significant (all p > 0.05).
conclusionsA high baseline eosinophil count and a lower RDW early on during therapy identify patients at increased risk of severe irAEs. These accessible measures could support personalised monitoring and biomarker-guided patient selection. However, external validation is needed to confirm the robustness and validate the thresholds identified in this study prior to clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.