ArticleBMC medical education2025
Design and validation of a questionnaire for perception of academic bullying in the clinical medical education environment.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcademic bullying (AB) in clinical medical education settings often involves excessive workloads, threats to professional standing, and verbal or sexual harassment. These behaviors can severely impact trainees’ psychological well-being and career development. Although general tools exist for assessing workplace bullying, no validated instrument is currently designed specifically to capture the unique dynamics of bullying within clinical medical education. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive questionnaire tailored to this context.
methodsThis mixed-method study was conducted across several teaching hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Questionnaire items were initially developed through literature review and focus group discussions. Content and face validity were established via expert panel evaluations and cognitive interviews. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed via average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability (CR), and the Fornell-Larcker criterion. The final version of the questionnaire was administered to 403 participants, including clinical medical students, residents, and fellows.
resultsThe finalized questionnaire included 41 items grouped into eight distinct factors, capturing a wide range of bullying behaviors such as professional sabotage, verbal and sexual harassment, gender and racist discrimination, educational deprivation, and abuse of authority. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the factor structure, with satisfactory model fit indices. The questionnaire demonstrated strong internal consistency across all subcategories (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7) and acceptable composite reliability (CR > 0.76). Convergent and discriminant validity were supported overall.
conclusionThis study developed and validated a reliable questionnaire to measure academic bullying in clinical medical education. The tool captures a wide range of bullying behaviors and can help guide future research, support institutional evaluations, and inform efforts to create safer and more respectful learning environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.