ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Effective coverage of skilled birth attendance in Ethiopia: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkilled birth attendance is among the crucial maternal health interventions for maternal and neonatal mortality reduction. The availability of core components of services at healthcare facilities and the quality-of-service provision are essential for the effective utilization of skilled birth attendance. Effective coverage measures the availability of essential components at health facilities and the quality of care delivered. This study aimed to measure effective coverage of skilled birth attendance in Ethiopia.
methodsWe applied the cascade approach to measure effective coverage, focusing on four steps up to quality-adjusted coverage as a proxy for effective coverage of skilled birth attendance. To assess the structural quality of facilities, we used the PMA service delivery assessment data in 2019. Effective coverage was defined as the product of skilled birth attendance, facility readiness score, intervention coverage (proportion who received uterotonic injection), and a process quality score.
resultsThe crude coverage for skilled delivery attendance was 54% (95%CI; 52, 56). The average level of facility readiness to provide skilled delivery service was 72%, ranging from 17% for private and non-governmental facilities to 88% for hospitals. The uterotonic injection coverage was 42% and the mean process quality for skilled delivery service was 46%. Based on the effective coverage cascade, the input-adjusted coverage was 38%, and the intervention-adjusted coverage was 16%, and the quality-adjusted coverage was 7%. Low level of facility readiness and low quality of service explain the low effective coverage of skilled delivery attendance. Apart from the overall low level of readiness, there was variability between different levels of facilities. Though the skilled delivery attendance coverage is improving, the low level of readiness, intervention provision, and poor process quality resulted in low effective coverage. The minimum level of readiness needs to be ensured at all levels of facilities to provide skilled delivery services. The minimum level of service readiness and quality of care need to be ensured at all facilities to provide skilled birth attendance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.