ArticleBMC public health2025
How multiracial emerging adults experience discrimination: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Examining Racial Identity Invalidation, Curvy Ideal Internalization, and Maladaptive Orthorexia Symptoms in Black-White Multiracial Women.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of multiracial people in the United States is increasing each year, yet there is a lack of research, particularly qualitative research, that sheds light on their distinctive lived experiences. Multiracial people have unique experiences compared to their monoracial peers because face multiple forms of discrimination: white supremacy-based racism, similar to that faced by non-white monoracial people, and unique forms such as identity invalidation. Previous research often frames a multiracial identity as strictly a source of challenges, which is a harmful stereotype promoting racism and overlooking the resilience, community strength, and other positive aspects that can accompany multiracial identities. This research is intended to explore the nuanced perspectives of multiracial individuals to better address and prevent the harmful impacts that racism has on mental and physical wellbeing. The purpose of this study is to explore how emerging adults who identify as multi-racial describe experiences with discrimination due to their multiracial identity.
methodsThis was a qualitative study conducted with emerging multiracial adults (aged 18-30 years) living in the United States. The data was collected through 21 virtual in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview guide covering racial and ethnic identification, childhood and upbringing, family influence, peer engagement, health and wellbeing, experiences of discrimination, forming resilience, language, and demographics. The interviews were transcribed for thematic analysis.
resultsThematic analysis of transcripts explored the various forms of discrimination participants experienced and its impacts on their lives, health, and wellbeing. Participants described diverse experiences of discrimination, along with social and professional difficulties and benefits tied to their identity. Many also reported adverse mental and physical health effects resulting from racism, but also spoke about the resilience, skills, and sense of community they developed in response.
conclusionParticipants' identities, experiences, and outcomes varied greatly, supporting the fact that multiracial people are not a monolithic group and that their identities carry unique benefits and challenges. The importance of understanding the lived experiences of multiracial people is becoming more essential as the number of people who identify as multiracial increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.