ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of SAAC accreditation on laboratories in Saudi Arabia according to ISO/IEC 17025:2017.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of Saudi Accreditation Center (SAAC) accreditation on laboratories in Saudi Arabia according to the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 standard by analysing nonconformities observed in 44 laboratories, namely, 7 calibration laboratories and 37 testing laboratories. Each laboratory was assessed by comparing nonconformities identified during initial versus periodic assessments, providing insights into the impact of accreditation on the quality of the laboratory system. Statistical analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, paired t tests, and effect size calculations to evaluate pre- and postaccreditation nonconformities. The results revealed a significant reduction in nonconformities for both laboratory types following accreditation. The calibration laboratories exhibited a 46% reduction in nonconformities, while the test laboratories demonstrated a 41% reduction. These findings affirm that SAAC accreditation significantly improves laboratory compliance, reduces nonconformities and enhances quality and reliability. The study concludes that SAAC accreditation plays a pivotal role in increasing operational excellence in laboratories across Saudi Arabia, supporting quality infrastructure and regulatory compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.