ArticleBMC cancer2025
Uncovering gaps in personalised lung cancer care in Germany: a white spot analysis.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer is among the most prevalent and deadly cancers, with around 57,000 new cases annually in Germany. Despite advances in targeted therapies, many patients still lack sufficient access to state-of-the-art comprehensive molecular diagnostics and personalised therapy throughout the disease course. This study identifies gaps in access to personalised lung cancer care in Germany. A primary objective was to analyse how many lung cancer patients are not captured by the established quality and network structures - namely, centres of the national Network Genomic Medicine (nNGM) and the lung cancer centres certified by the German Cancer Society (DKG) - to identify and ultimately close these gaps.
methodsPublicly available data were used from inpatient quality reports, the databases of nNGM and certified lung cancer centres (DKG-LZ), the outpatient specialist medical care programme (ASV) supplemented by incidence data from the German Centre for Cancer Registry Data (2022). Differences among nNGM, DKG-LZ and ASV were assessed, focusing on non-affiliated hospitals as proxies for putative lack of quality-assured molecular diagnostic access. Geographic mapping was used to visualise regional disparities.
resultsThe analysis included 993 hospitals with a total of 167,216 reimbursed lung cancer cases. 240 hospitals with 98,797 cases (59%) are affiliated with the nNGM. 108 hospitals with 78,591 cases (47%) are certified or cooperate with a DKG-LZ. ASV is provided at 152 hospitals or ASV partner hospitals (71,763 cases, 43%). nNGM and DKG jointly cover 276 hospitals and 114,472 cases (69%). Adding ASV, overall quality-affiliated coverage increases to 124,419 cases (74%). However, 668 hospitals with a total of 42,797 cases (26%) are not affiliated with any of these structures. Geographic analysis revealed regional disparities, notably in Northern Brandenburg, Lower Saxony, and Saxony-Anhalt characterised by high-incidence areas and non-affiliated hospitals managing large volumes of lung cancer cases.
conclusionsSignificant disparities in access to quality-assured molecular diagnostics persist. Expanding nNGM and integrating high-volume hospitals could raise coverage to over 85%. Standardising molecular diagnostics and quality requirements across nNGM, DKG, and ASV could further optimise access to high-quality personalised lung cancer care in Germany and build a unified real-world evidence base for equitable, consistent care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.