Trial reportScientific reports2025
Transcranial direct current stimulation of the occipitotemporal cortex enhances identification of ambiguous faces.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on face identification and related perceptual processes: a systematic review.Psychological research · 2026Pooled it
- Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) via the Fp3-Fp2 montage disrupts face recognition skills.Oxford open neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a promising tool for investigating the neural mechanisms underlying various brain functions and for enhancing related behavioral performance. In this sham-controlled, between-subjects study, we examined the effects of tDCS applied to the right and left occipitotemporal cortex (OTC) on face identification performance using a delayed match-to-sample task with morphed face images of varying discrimination difficulty. Three active montages were tested: (M1) anode on the right OTC and cathode on the left OTC, (M2) anode on the left OTC and cathode on the right OTC, and (M3) anode on the right OTC with the cathode on the left shoulder. A total of 47 participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: M1 (n = 13), M2 (n = 12), M3 (n = 13), and Sham (n = 9). The results showed a significant improvement in face discrimination performance with the M1 montage relative to the sham condition. Although performance also improved in M2 and M3, these effects were not significantly different from the sham group. Across all montages, the largest impact on non-match discrimination was observed under more ambiguous conditions, particularly at a 30% morph distance, which corresponded to the point of subjective equality. Furthermore, tDCS stimulation led to longer reaction times across all montages, with the significant delays noted in M1 and M3. Findings of this preliminary study suggest a hemispheric laterality bias in face identity discrimination following tDCS-induced neural modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.