Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387763›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

BlueEdge neural network approach and its application to automated data type classification in mobile edge computing.

Nagwa Elmobark, Haitham El-Ghareeb, Sara Elhishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nagwa ElmobarkDepartment of Computer Science, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt. eng_nagwaelmobark@yahoo.com.
Haitham El-GhareebDepartment of Computer Science, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
Sara ElhishiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to the increasing number of IoT gadgets and the growth of big data, we are now facing massive amounts of diverse data that require proper preprocessing before they can be analyzed. Conventional methods involve sending data directly to the cloud, where it is cleaned and sorted, resulting in a more crowded network, increased latency, and a potential threat to users’ privacy. This paper presents an enhanced version of the BlueEdge framework—a neural network solution designed for the automated classification of data types on edge devices. We achieve this by utilizing a feed-forward neural network and optimized features to identify the presence of 14 distinct data types. Because of this, input data can be preprocessed near its source, and not in the cloud. We utilized a comprehensive dataset comprising 1400 samples, encompassing various data formats from around the world. Compared with rule-based methods, experimental assessment achieves better performance, and results in reduced data transmission (reduced by 62%) and processing latency (78 times faster than cloud-based systems), with resource efficiency comparable to low-end mobile devices. Additionally, our strategy demonstrates strong performance under various data conditions, achieving accuracy levels of over 85% on datasets that may include variations and a noise level as high as 20%. The approach used here is capable of processing data for IoT devices used in education, which can lead to more efficient connections with the cloud and better privacy preservation.

Indexed as

Automated data type detectionEdge computingIoT data preprocessingNeural network classificationResource-efficient computing

Identifiers

PMID41387763
PMCPMC12705763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.