ArticleNPJ science of learning2025
Reading experience reveals shared and idiosyncratic neural patterns during text comprehension.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language and reading experience foster interpersonal alignment in communication, yet their impact on shared and idiosyncratic neural patterns in language comprehension remains underexplored. In this study, we investigate how individual differences in reading experience influence neural similarity across readers. We used a topicalized Author Recognition Test to profile participants' reading experience across diverse topics and used an fMRI task to measure neural activity while participants read narrative and expository texts. We found that greater print exposure was associated with enhanced alignment with others in bilateral semantic regions during narrative reading. In contrast, during expository comprehension, higher print exposure was related to more idiosyncratic patterns in the frontoparietal control network (FPN). Inter-subject representational similarity analysis further revealed shared brain-behavior patterns between distributed reading experience and activities in the default mode network (DMN). These findings highlight how accumulative reading experience is related to both shared and individualized neural dynamics during language comprehension.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.