ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025
Feature learning augmented with sampling and heuristics (FLASH) improves model performance and biomarker identification.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Big biological datasets, such as gene expression profiles, often contain redundant features that degrade model performance and limit generalization across independent datasets with complexities like class imbalance and hidden sub-clusters. To overcome challenges, we present 'FLASH', a novel feature selection method combining filtration and heuristic-based systematic elimination. FLASH generates random samples and computes p-values for each feature using multiple statistical tests (t-test, ANOVA, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum, Brunner-Munzel, Mann-Whitney). Features are scored by aggregating significant p-values across samples. The coefficient from the machine learning model with the highest accuracy on the filtered features is used to rank them. Recursive elimination with cross-validation systematically removes features while monitoring accuracy. The final subset is selected based on the highest performance during elimination, to achieve effective feature selection. We show that our method preserves predictive performance on independent datasets. Our comprehensive evaluation across diverse datasets showed that FLASH outperforms the compared feature selection methods dRFE, Mutual information, MRMR, ElasticNet, NeuralNet, Permutation test and SAGA within the scope of our tested datasets and evaluation settings. Additionally, features selected by FLASH demonstrated greater biological relevance, as evidenced by higher overlap with disease-associated genes from DisGeNET in an independent dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.