ArticleNPJ breast cancer2025
Immune-stromal heterogeneity in breast cancer across diverse ancestries: impact on prognosis and treatment response.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative coupling of clonal CNV evolution and spatially restricted malignant states identifies MFGE8 as a candidate late-state-associated target in breast cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Targeting Matrix Stiffness and Mechanotransduction in Breast Cancer: Implications for Emerging Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Genomic and epigenomic diversity of breast cancer across Western and MENA populations: implications for precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer immune phenotypes influence treatment response and clinical outcomes, yet their ancestry-specific variations remain underexplored. Here, we analyzed transcriptomic data from over 13,000 breast tumors across six ancestry groups to characterize immune-stromal profiles and their association with ancestry, biological features, treatment response, and survival outcomes. Expression patterns were validated by spatial proteomics and immunohistochemistry. K-means clustering consistently identified three immune phenotypes (Hot, Moderate, or Cold) that varied significantly by ancestry, age, molecular subtype, and prognosis. Logistic regression and ancestry-associated analyses revealed that while immune phenotypes were primarily driven by PAM50 subtype, age, and disease stage, notable ancestry-related differences persisted, with European ancestry generally exhibiting higher immune and stromal activity across breast cancer subtypes. Hot tumors, enriched in the Basal-like and HER2 subtypes, were associated with younger age, higher immune infiltration, and improved overall survival. African ancestry was linked to elevated immune scores and upregulation of BTLA-mediated T cell co-inhibition, suggesting sensitivity to immunotherapy. European and East Asian tumors showed stromal enrichment, particularly inflammatory and myofibroblastic cancer-associated fibroblasts, associated with poor prognosis. Core immune activation genes (e.g., CD3, CD2, and CXCL10) were conserved, while ancestry-specific signatures and chemokine signaling were identified. This study uncovers both shared and ancestry-specific immunogenomic features of breast cancer, highlighting the role of ancestry and other biological features in shaping the tumor immune microenvironment. These findings re-emphasize the need for population-informed approaches in breast cancer immunotherapy and biomarker development, to ensure equitable precision oncology strategies across global populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.