Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387667›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2025

ResNet-Powered Multi-Class Identification of Sequence Patterns for Genome Replication Timing Analysis.

Zhen-Ning Yin, Yu-Hao Zeng, Feng Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhen-Ning YinDepartment of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Yu-Hao ZengDepartment of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Feng GaoDepartment of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China. fgao@tju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9563-3841

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31571358National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise regulation of DNA replication timing (RT) relies on deciphering sequence patterns. Although significant advances have been made in identifying sequence patterns associated with replication timing, there are still few computational pipelines designed for accurate RT prediction. In this study, we propose a deep learning-based framework, named RT-Predictor, leveraging a residual network (ResNet) to classify sequence patterns associated with RT across the human genome into four distinct domains: early replication domain (ERD), down transition zone (DTZ), late replication domain (LRD), and up transition zone (UTZ). Using solely DNA sequence patterns, the model achieves an accuracy of 74.58%, a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.6612, an F1-score of 0.7458, and a Recall of 0.7457, demonstrating its ability to resolve complex DNA replication timing patterns. By incorporating positional and frequency-based features derived from DNA sequences, we extract a comprehensive set of 384 features that effectively characterize replication dynamics. Genome-wide RT prediction reveals that replication origins (ORIs) predominantly initiate replication during the early S-phase, potentially linking specific sequence patterns to DNA damage repair mechanisms. These findings demonstrate the power of deep learning in decoding the regulatory significance of sequence patterns in replication timing and provide critical insights into the molecular basis of genomic stability and its disruption in diseases, particularly cancer.

Indexed as

Deep learningReplication originReplication timing

Identifiers

PMID41387667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.