SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Radiomics and artificial intelligence for predicting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor consistency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence in pituitary adenomas (PitNETs): from imaging biomarkers to clinical translation.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) represent approximately 16% of primary brain tumors. Tumor consistency, whether soft or hard, directly affects surgical strategy, extent of resection, and risk of complications. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of artificial intelligence and radiomics to predict the consistency of PitNETs. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the prediction of PitNET consistency using radiomics and artificial intelligence algorithms. Study quality was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score and the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Nine studies comprising 935 patients were included, with 67.8% having soft and 32.2% hard tumors. Radiomics models, using varied MRI protocols and primarily manual segmentation, selected an average of 10.4 features from 691.8 extracted. Pooled diagnostic performance showed an accuracy of 84%, sensitivity 86%, specificity 78%, and area under the curve 0.91. Considerable heterogeneity (I² up to 100%) was observed due to differences in MRI acquisition, segmentation, and subjective definitions of tumor consistency. None of the studies included external validation. Radiomics and artificial intelligence show potential in the preoperative prediction of PitNET consistency, which may assist surgical planning and reduce complications. However, methodological heterogeneity, subjective reference standards, and lack of external validation limit the generalizability of current results. Standardized imaging protocols and multicenter validation are required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41387657What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.