Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387657›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025

Radiomics and artificial intelligence for predicting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor consistency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maria Isabel Ocampo-Navia, Mariana Agudelo-Arrieta, Felipe Marín-Navas, Alex Taub-Krivoy, Wilfran Perez-Mendez, Nayeh Arana-Isaac, Lucas Pari Mitre, Oscar Hernando Feo-Lee

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Isabel Ocampo-NaviaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia. maria_ocampo@javeriana.edu.co.
Mariana Agudelo-ArrietaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Felipe Marín-NavasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alex Taub-KrivoyNeurosurgery Research Group, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Wilfran Perez-MendezNeurosurgery Research Group, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Nayeh Arana-IsaacNeurosurgery Research Group, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Lucas Pari MitreMedical Student, Faculty of Medicine, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brasil.
Oscar Hernando Feo-LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) represent approximately 16% of primary brain tumors. Tumor consistency, whether soft or hard, directly affects surgical strategy, extent of resection, and risk of complications. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of artificial intelligence and radiomics to predict the consistency of PitNETs. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the prediction of PitNET consistency using radiomics and artificial intelligence algorithms. Study quality was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score and the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Nine studies comprising 935 patients were included, with 67.8% having soft and 32.2% hard tumors. Radiomics models, using varied MRI protocols and primarily manual segmentation, selected an average of 10.4 features from 691.8 extracted. Pooled diagnostic performance showed an accuracy of 84%, sensitivity 86%, specificity 78%, and area under the curve 0.91. Considerable heterogeneity (I² up to 100%) was observed due to differences in MRI acquisition, segmentation, and subjective definitions of tumor consistency. None of the studies included external validation. Radiomics and artificial intelligence show potential in the preoperative prediction of PitNET consistency, which may assist surgical planning and reduce complications. However, methodological heterogeneity, subjective reference standards, and lack of external validation limit the generalizability of current results. Standardized imaging protocols and multicenter validation are required before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeuroendocrine TumorsPituitary NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiomicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMRI imagingPituitary neuroendocrine tumorsRadiomicsTumor consistency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.