ReviewCommunications medicine2025
Clinical recognition of frontotemporal dementia with right temporal predominance: a consensus statement from the International Working Group.
Review in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioural and psychological symptom determinants of carer burden across clinical syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer's disease: a transdiagnostic analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Emotional brain responses and pattern expressions in right temporal variant frontotemporal dementia.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Comparing the value of dynamic versus static image-based tests of emotion recognition in neurodegenerative disease.Journal of neuropsychology · 2026Article
- Frontotemporal dementia with right temporal predominance: a clinical comparison with left-predominant FTD.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Right-lateralized maladaptive topological reorganization in hyperthyroidism.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Review
- Unifying Divergent Conceptions in Nonfluent/Agrammatic and Semantic Primary Progressive Aphasia.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Multi-level language deficits in behavioural frontotemporal degeneration and related disorders.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Design and baseline findings of the NEODEM prospective cohort on early-onset neurodegenerative dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with right anterior temporal lobe (RATL) predominance remains challenging due to lack of clinical characterization, and standardized terminology. The recent research of the International Working Group (IWG) identified common symptoms but also unveiled broad terminologies lacking precision and operationalization, with risk of misdiagnoses, inappropriate referrals and poor clinical management. Based on the published evidence (91267 articles screened) and expert opinion (105 FTD specialists across 52 centers) by using the nominal group technique, the IWG delineates three primary domains of impairment causing behavioral, memory and language problems: (i) multimodal knowledge of non-verbal information including people, living beings, landmarks, flavors/odors, sounds, bodily sensations, emotions and social cues; (ii) socioemotional behavior encompassing emotion expression, social response and motivation; and (iii) prioritization for focus on specific interests, hedonic valuation and personal preferences. This study establishes a consensus on clinical profile, phenotypic nomenclature, and future directions to enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.