Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387553›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2026

Improving infant health equity: what have we learned, what do we do.

DeWayne M Pursley, F Sessions Cole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

DeWayne M PursleyDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, and Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
F Sessions ColeDivision of Newborn Medicine, Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, and St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis MO, and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. fcole@wustl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States neonatal and infant mortality rates have declined substantially over the last six decades. Despite these reductions, significant racial disparities in mortality and other important outcomes have persisted. While increased risk of preterm birth is a major contributor to these differences, racial inequities in risk-adjusted outcomes such as gestational age-specific and major congenital anomaly-associated mortality remain. Race-specific differences in inter- and intra-neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) practices associated with worse outcomes for infants of color suggest opportunities for reducing these disparate health outcomes during and after NICU hospitalization. Identifying NICU-based contributing factors and implementing factor-specific improvement strategies can lead to more equitable outcomes. In this review, we describe examples of racial inequities in risk-adjusted NICU outcomes and inter- and intra-NICU practices associated with worse outcomes for infants of color, provide an overview of current approaches to health equity in NICU care, and identify opportunities, sustainable strategies, and accountabilities for more equitable care and support of NICU patients and, quite importantly, their families. IMPACT: Characterize racial inequities in risk-adjusted neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) outcomes and inter- and intra-NICU practices associated with worse outcomes for infants of color. Provide an overview of current trends in and approaches to health equity in NICU care. Discuss strategies for implementing and sustaining more equitable care and support for infants and families during NICU hospitalization.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth EquityInfant HealthHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41387553
PMCPMC13524823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.