ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical characteristics and prognostic impact of HER2 low expression in breast cancer subtypes from a Brazilian real-world cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer among Brazilian women, yet related data remain limited. The HER2-low classification has gained significance with the advent of targeted therapies. This study aimed to assess survival outcomes of HER2-low BC compared to other subtypes in a real-world Brazilian cohort. We analyzed data from 8,485 breast cancer patients treated at Pérola Byington Hospital between 2010 and 2019. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, stratified by cancer subtype. The t-test and chi-square test evaluated variable associations, while multivariate analysis calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Cox regression assessed survival, and Kaplan-Meier curves illustrated OS differences. The patients with HER2-low breast cancers showed significantly better overall survival than those with the triple-negative subtype (p < 0.01). However, they had significantly poorer overall survival than those with the Luminal A-like subtype (p < 0.01). The patients with triple-negative HER2-low disease had a higher risk of mortality than those with HER2-0 (p < 0.01). Finally, patients who achieved pathological complete response experienced significantly better overall survival than those who did not (p < 0.01). Our findings highlight triple negative HER2-low BC as a distinct subtype identifiable via standard immunohistochemistry, beyond just biomarker status. The study underscores the prognostic diversity among BC subtypes and emphasizes the importance of personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.