ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating force and motion in posterior vitreous detachment manoeuvres using a robotic data acquisition system in cadaveric human eyes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep vitrectomy, a complex ophthalmic procedure, demands precise instrument control and remains challenging to master. This study evaluated the ARASH:ASiST robotic system as a platform for real-time, quantitative assessment of deep vitrectomy in a pre-clinical setting using cadaveric human eyes. The system records force and motion data without disrupting the surgical workflow. Cadaveric eyes were prepared under strict safety protocols, and a mannequin head with a customised eye holder was designed, refined through repeated testing, and approved by surgeons to fully imitate real-world conditions. Four surgeons with different levels of experience, defined by their years of practice, performed the “drunk walk” manoeuvre while intraoperative force, positional, and temporal data were captured. Despite the inherent limitations of human cadaveric eyes, the aim was to reproduce the drunk walk method as a precise, predefined trajectory for posterior vitreous detachment induction. In total, 14 surgical trials were recorded: 2 from one expert surgeon (right-handed), 4 from two fellows (right-handed), and 8 from one intermediate surgeon, who performed four procedures with each hand. Quantitative metrics, including Normalised Jerk, Force Range, Peak Force Magnitude, and Force RMS, were used to compare individual performances. Group-level comparisons between expert, fellow, and intermediate surgeons were conducted using ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests. While not statistically significant, likely due to the limited sample size, the analysis of descriptive statistics and effect sizes indicated potential trends in performance metrics across experience levels, highlighting the feasibility of the platform for capturing such variations. During data acquisition, the robotic system’s remote-centre-of-motion was accurately calibrated with laser-based technology, while encoders and force sensors were also precisely calibrated. The system’s real-time graphical interface provided immediate feedback and enabled detailed postoperative analysis. Usability testing confirmed its practicality and non-intrusiveness. Overall, the ARASH:ASiST system demonstrates feasibility as an objective platform for the evaluation of deep vitrectomy based on ex vivo results. These findings support further validation of this prototype in synthetic and clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.