ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting myopia risk using a machine learning model based on fundus imageomics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on fundus characteristics of preschool children based on artificial intelligence quantitative technology.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Myo-ODE: continuous-time trajectory reconstruction and risk prediction of high myopia via neural ordinary differential equations.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quantitative color fundus photography parameters as potential biomarkers of axial length progression: evidence from a machine learning cohort study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Choroidal thickness and peripapillary RNFL in relation to axial length and progression in myopic children.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning-based model using quantitative color fundus photography (CFP) data to predict myopia risk in school-age children, based on the axial length/corneal curvature radius (AL/CR) ratio, and to identify key retinal features associated with myopia progression. This cross-sectional study included 2,184 CFPs from children aged 6-10 years. Retinal imageomics features were extracted from CFPs using the EVisionAI platform, alongside age and sex data, resulting in 146 variables. After feature selection using LASSO regression and expert review, predictive models were constructed using seven machine learning algorithms, including random forest (RF), XGBoost, and LightGBM. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and calibration. The RF model showed the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.798), followed by LightGBM and XGBoost. Key predictors included age, nasal disc-foveal distance, atrophic areas, and vascular parameters. The RF model demonstrated high specificity (0.80) and moderate sensitivity (0.59), with robust calibration and decision curve analysis confirming its clinical value. This study demonstrates that quantitative CFP-derived imageomics, combined with machine learning, can effectively predict myopia risk in school-age children. The RF model, incorporating age, retinal distances, and vascular features, offers a promising tool for early myopia risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.