ArticleScientific reports2025
Threat-related corticocortical connectivity elicited by rapid auditory looms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semantic processing and individual suggestibility modulate motor preparation and perceived distance for looming sounds entering the peripersonal space.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- How the brain predicts timing: distinct network hubs for predicting and evaluating auditory sensory events.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Reframing neuroergonomics in an evolutionary and active inference context.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2026Article
- The role of spatial perception in auditory looming bias: neurobehavioral evidence from impossible ears.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Short-Term Statistical Learning Mitigates the Ill-Posed Problem of Sound Localization.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While sounds of approaching objects are generally more salient than those of receding ones, the traditional association of this auditory looming bias with threat perception is subject to debate. Differences between looming and receding sounds may also be learned through non-threatening multisensory information or influenced by confounding stimulus characteristics. To investigate, we analyzed corticocortical connectivity patterns from electroencephalography, examining the preferential processing of looming sounds under different attentional states. To simulate rapid distance changes, we used complementary distance cues, previously studied in the looming bias literature. We observed crucial involvement of frontal cortical regions typically associated with threat and fear responses. Our findings suggest an underlying bias within the ventral 'what' stream rather than within the dorsal 'where' stream in auditory information processing, even when the participants' task was solely focused on the discrimination of movement direction. These results support the idea, that the perceptual bias towards looming sounds reflects an auditory threat detection mechanism, while offering insights into the neural function involved in processing ecologically relevant environmental cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.