Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387487›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Greater exposure to PM

Magali M S Vandevenne, Sara B A Mokhtar, Hans Bosma, Carroll A B Webers, Rudy M M A Nuijts, Tos T J M Berendschot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magali M S VandevenneUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. magali.vandevenne@mumc.nl.
Sara B A MokhtarUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hans BosmaDepartment of Social Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Carroll A B WebersUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rudy M M A NuijtsUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tos T J M BerendschotUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the associations between exposure to ambient air pollutants and the Belin/Ambrosio Enhanced Ectasia score (BAD score), a tomographic parameter for identifying corneas at risk for ectasia. This prospective cross-sectional study uses data from the Maastricht Study, a population-based cohort of adults aged 40-75 years living in and around Maastricht, the Netherlands. Participants underwent corneal tomography with a Pentacam HR. The BADD score was used to assess keratoconus risk. The annual average concentrations of air pollutants-PM2.5, PM10, nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), and soot-from the Geoscience and Health Cohort Consortium (GECCO) were used. Associations between standardized Z-scores of air pollutants and the BADD score were analysed via multiple linear regression models, adjusting for potential confounders, including age, sex, education, glucose metabolism status, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Data from 6343 eyes were included. Higher concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, and soot were significantly associated with higher BADD scores, indicating an increased risk of keratoconus [PM2.5: β = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.05; PM10: β = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.05; soot: β = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.04]. No significant association was found for NO₂ [stβ (95% CI): NO2 0.01 (-0.02; 0.03)] (p = 0.609). We found a significant influence of type 2 diabetes on the associations between PM2.5 or PM10 and the BADD score (p = 0.037 and p = 0.041, respectively). Our study revealed that exposure to relatively high levels of PM2.5, PM10, and soot are associated with relatively high BADD scores. Our results support the following hypotheses: air pollution is a risk factor for keratoconus, and T2DM may have a potential protective effect on the development of keratoconus.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsEnvironmental ExposureKeratoconusParticulate MatterAdultAgedAir PollutionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAir PollutantsParticulate MatterAir pollutionBADD scoreDiabetes mellitusEpidemiologyKeratoconusParticulate matterPentacamTomography

Identifiers

PMID41387487
PMCPMC12700858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.