ReviewExperimental physiology2025
Modulation of cerebral blood flow and cognition by hyperthermia and hypoxia: An electroencephalographic event-related potentials perspective.
Review in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does a pharmacologically driven elevation in cerebral blood flow modulate cognition during combined hypoxic and thermal stress?Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026Trial
- Modulation of cerebral blood flow and cognition by hyperthermia and hypoxia: An electroencephalographic event-related potentials perspective.Experimental physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is essential for sustaining neuronal metabolism and cognitive performance; however, the precise relationship between perfusion and cognition remains unclear. Although ageing and disease are associated with progressive declines in CBF and cognitive impairment, the acute effects of altered CBF under environmental stressors have not been elucidated fully. The influence of environmental stress on cognitive function is likely to depend on the degree of stress (e.g., its intensity and duration). Therefore, it is necessary to carry out a systematic review of a large number of studies, and objective evidence is required to build a comprehensive dataset. This review summarizes research examining the effects of mild to moderate passive heat stress (an increase in core temperature of ∼1.0°C-1.5°C) and acute hypoxia on cognitive processing, as evaluated using electroencephalographic event-related potentials (EEG-ERPs), with the aim of facilitating future cross-experimental comparisons. During mild or greater hyperthermia, CBF decreases owing to blood flow redistribution and hypocapnia-induced by hyperventilation, whereas during hypoxia, CBF can either increase or decrease depending on the conditions (e.g., exposure time or intensity). To standardize comparisons, this review focuses on acute hypoxic exposures, during which CBF tends to decrease. Although it is undeniable that the content summarized here might be somewhat selective, it is hoped that this foundation will contribute to the future development of constructive and objective evaluations. Current evidence indicates that acute fluctuations in CBF are unlikely to predict cognitive outcomes. Rather, both heat and hypoxic stress appear to impair neural activity through mechanisms beyond perfusion alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.