ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026
Association of Corticospinal Tract Asymmetry With Ambulatory Ability After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAmbulatory ability after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is important to patients. We tested whether asymmetry between ipsi- and contra-lesional corticospinal tracts (CSTs) assessed by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is associated with post-ICH ambulation.
methodsPatients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH were recruited from 8 US sites between 2017 and 2024. For each patient, fractional anisotropy (FA) asymmetry index (AI) was computed for the whole CST and on a subset of fibers restricted to the cerebral peduncle (CP). Clinical and radiographic features were collected. The primary outcome was Barthel Index Mobility Score (BIMS) at 3 months (dichotomized outcome [DO]: BIMS 15 = good [independent ambulation]; BIMS < 15 = poor [non-independent ambulation]; ordinal outcome [OO]: BIMS 0, 5, 10, 15). Two imputation-based multiple logistic regression analyses accounted for whether ICH prevented tracking of CSTs. Odds ratios (ORs) were reported for a change of 0.1 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsAt 3 months, 124 patients were eligible for inclusion. In addition to known clinical variables, CST and CP FA AI were associated with poor BIMS (OR 2.97, CI 1.12-7.90, p = 0.029; OR 3.80, CI 1.63-8.84, p = 0.002). In Model 1, unresolved FA (FA zero) was not correlated with lower BIMS (DO: OR 3.25, CI 0.62-17.07, p = 0.163; ordinal outcomes: OR 2.02, CI 0.48-8.55, p = 0.341). In Model 2, the combination of CST FA AI and FA zero correlated with lower BIMS (DO: joint p-value =0.041; OO: p = 0.030). CP FA asymmetry was associated with lower BIMS (DO: OR 3.96, CI 1.25-12.55, p = 0.019; OO: OR 3.39, CI 1.24-9.27, p = 0.017).
conclusionDTI-assessed CST integrity may be an additional tool physicians can utilize to guide post-ICH ambulatory expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.