ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Quality-adjusted life years in the presence and absence of organized mammographic screening using data from BreastScreen Norway.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benefits and harms of breast cancer (BC) screening with mammography have been debated and, although most studies reported positive effects, some studies found a negative effect in terms of net quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We aimed to estimate net QALYs associated with biennial mammographic screening for women aged 50-69 years offered to 100,000 women followed until age 85, using various assumptions on BC mortality reduction, overdiagnosis and mortality transfer (the extent to which a reduction in BC mortality results in a reduction in all-cause mortality). Individual-level data from women invited to BreastScreen Norway during 1996-2020 were used to perform the calculations. The three baseline scenarios included (1) Model Microsimulation Screening Analysis (MISCAN): MISCAN prediction for mortality reduction and overdiagnosis proportion; (2) Model A: 40% BC mortality reduction and 15% overdiagnosis; and (3) Model B: 20% BC mortality reduction and 50% overdiagnosis. For all scenarios, an 80% mortality transfer was assumed. An online tool was developed to illustrate the impact of alternative assumptions. Biennial organized mammographic screening for women aged 50-69 years who were followed until the age of 85 years was associated with 6819, 7444 and 2446 net QALYs gained per 100,000 women for Model MISCAN, A and B, respectively. Assumptions on BC mortality reduction exhibited the largest impact on net QALYs. To conclude, even when assuming a high overdiagnosis proportion and low BC mortality reduction, net QALYs remained positive, reinforcing the value of offering BC screening with mammography to Norwegian women and showing its potential to improve health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.