ReviewThe New phytologist2026
Modelling stomatal mechanics: a critical review.
Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stomata: an introduction to a Virtual Issue.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- A review of guard cell wall architecture in shaping stomatal morphology and function.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The biomechanics of stomatal movements have fascinated scientists for almost 150 yr, yet we still lack a conclusive and coherent mechanistic understanding of the process. In this review, we present a framework that allows critical insight into the state of knowledge of stomatal biomechanics, with a focus on modelling approaches. We apply the framework in two ways. First, contextualising the history, we show how the nature and function of models of stomatal mechanics have evolved. Second, we use the framework to appraise three key features of extant models: cell wall mechanical properties, guard cell shape, and the role of surrounding epidermal cells. We evaluate the empirical origin and model representations of these features, summarising how each is currently thought to explain stomatal function, while also identifying limitations in our understanding. We propose that a better appreciation of gaps in knowledge in the empirical domain, particularly the actual shifts in cell shape during stomatal response, combined with careful reinterpretation of existing data, will lead to new insight and a more complete understanding of stomatal mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.