False Positive or False Negative-An Interesting Case in Prenatal Diagnostic Laboratory.

backgroundPrenatal diagnosis relies on diverse clinical laboratory techniques to assess the health status of a developing fetus in utero. When multiple diagnostic methods applied to the same fetal sample yield discordant results, some suggestive of abnormalities and others normal, this discrepancy poses substantial challenges to accurate clinical interpretation and decision-making. CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old pregnant woman underwent non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) that yielded an abnormal fetal screening result. Subsequent prenatal diagnostic assessments, including single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-Array analysis and prenatal BACs-on-Beads (PNBoBs) assay, suggested a normal fetal karyotype. However, conventional karyotypic analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) uncovered fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

conclusionsDifferent diagnostic techniques possess distinct strengths, limitations, and applicable scopes. Certain abnormalities may evade detection by a single technique due to technical constraints or sample-specific biological characteristics. Therefore, in prenatal diagnosis, clinicians should select suitable diagnostic modalities based on clinical context. When necessary, multiple complementary methods should be employed for cross-validation to approximate the true fetal status and avoid missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses.